Self-reporting of hearing loss and tinnitus in the diagnosis of ototoxicity by meglumine antimoniate in patients treated for American tegumentary Leishmaniasis.

INTRODUCTION: American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis (ATL) treatment is based on pentavalent antimonials (Sb5+), but these drugs have been associated to several adverse effects. Hearing loss and tinnitus during treatment with meglumine antimoniate (MA) have already been reported. This study aimed to describe the usefulness of self-reporting of hearing loss and tinnitus in diagnosing MA-induced ototoxicity. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted with 102 patients with parasitological diagnosis of ATL, treated with different MA schemes. The presence of clinical auditory toxicity was defined as the emergence or worsening of self-reporting hearing loss and/or tinnitus during monitoring. Measures of sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive value of the patient's self-reporting of hearing loss and tinnitus in relation to the result of the audiometric test (considered the gold standard) were calculated. RESULTS: The age of the evaluated patients ranged from 15 to 81 years, with a median of 41 years, and most were male (73.5%). Seventy-five patients (73.5%) had cutaneous leishmaniasis and 27 (26.5%) mucosal leishmaniasis. Eighty-six patients (84.3%) received intramuscular (IM) treatment and 16 (15.7%) were treated with intralesional MA. During treatment, 18 (17,6%) had tinnitus and 7 (6,9%) had complaint of hearing loss. 53 (52%) patients had cochlear toxicity confirmed by tone threshold audiometry and high frequency audiometry, from which 60% received a dose of 20 mg Sb5+/kg/day (p = 0.015) and 96.2% were treated with IM MA (p = 0.001). Tinnitus has greater specificity and positive predictive value than hearing loss, with a low number of false positives, but with a high false negative value. CONCLUSION: Although the large number of false negatives suggests that self-report of hearing loss or tinnitus cannot be considered a good screening test for referring the patient to an audiometry, the low number of false positives suggests the need to value the patient's complaint for referral. Otherwise, this study reinforces the importance of audiological monitoring during treatment with MA, especially in those patients with self-reporting of hearing loss or tinnitus when treated with 20 mg Sb5+/kg/day via IM.

Comparison of Meglumine Antimoniate and Miltefosine in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of meglumine antimoniate and miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Pakistan. STUDY DESIGN: Randomised-controlled trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Dermatology, Combined Military Hospital, Lahore and Peshawar, from January to December 2021. METHODOLOGY: Smear positive and/or skin biopsy-confirmed cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis in adult males aged between 18-60 years were enrolled after receiving informed consent. Patients were randomly divided into Group A and Group B by lottery method. Group A received intramuscular meglumine antimoniate 15-20mg/kg/day, and Group B received oral miltefosine 50 mg thrice a day for a duration of 28 days. Data were analysed by SPSS 22. Effectiveness and safety of therapeutic agents were calculated by Independent t-test and p-value of 0.05 or less was taken as significant. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients, 33 in each group, participated in the study. Total number of cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions were 77 in Group A and 76 in Group B. The duration of lesions was 3.5 months in Group A and 3.2 months in Group B. Treatment response, in terms of complete or near complete resolution of lesions, was significantly higher in Group A as compared to Group B (p = 0.011). Both therapeutic agents had considerable side-effects with more patients withdrawn from Group A as compared to Group B (p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Intra-muscular meglumine antimoniate was more effective in comparison to oral miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. However, efficacy of meglumine antimoniate is mired by its side-effect profile. KEY WORDS: Cutaneous leishmaniasis, Meglumine antimoniate, Miltefosine, Efficacy, Side-effects, Adverse effects, Safety, Treatment, Old world cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Transcrocetin Meglumine Salt Inhibits Spinal Glial Cell-Mediated Proinflammatory Cytokines and Attenuates Complete Freund's Adjuvant-Induced Inflammatory Pain.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory pain is a significant global clinical challenge that involves both unpleasant sensory and emotional experiences. The treatment of pain is imminent, and we are committed to seeking new analgesics for pain relief. Transcrocetin meglumine salt (TCMS), a saffron metabolite derived from the crocin apocarotenoids, has exhibited the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and exert neuroprotective effects. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether TCMS could ameliorate complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced inflammatory pain in mice and elucidate its underlying mechanisms. METHODS: Here, we established an inflammatory pain model in mice by injecting CFA into the left hind paw. Three days later, we administered intraperitoneal injections of TCMS (10 mg/kg) or saline to the animals. We examined mechanical allodynia, thermal hypersensitivity, and anxiety behavior. Furthermore, the activation of glial cells and proinflammatory cytokines in the spinal cord were detected. RESULTS: Our results showed that TCMS significantly reversed the mechanical allodynia and thermal hypersensitivity in the CFA-injected mice. Furthermore, TCMS administration effectively inhibited the activation of microglia and astrocytes in the spinal cord induced by CFA. Additionally, TCMS suppressed the production and release of spinal proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1ß, and IL-6, in CFA-injected mice. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our findings demonstrate that TCMS holds promise as an innovative analgesic due to its ability to ameliorate inflammatory reactions.

A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority, Multicenter Trial of Systemic vs Intralesional Treatment With Meglumine Antimoniate for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Meglumine antimoniate (MA) remains the main treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). Uncontrolled studies suggest that intralesional MA (IL-MA) may be noninferior and safer than systemic MA (S-MA). METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of IL-MA in 3 infiltrations at 14-day intervals compared with S-MA (10-20 mg Sb5+/kg/day, 20 days) for CL, with noninferiority margin of 20%. Primary and secondary outcomes were definitive cure at day 180 and epithelialization rate at day 90 of treatment, respectively. A 2-year follow-up was performed to assess relapses and emergence of mucosal lesions. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored according to the Division of AIDS AE grading system. RESULTS: We evaluated 135 patients. The cure rates (95% confidence interval) for IL-MA and S-MA treatment were, respectively, 82.8% (70.5-91.4) and 67.8% (53.3-78.3) per protocol (PP) and 70.6% (58.3-81.0) and 59.7% (47.0-71.5) per intention to treat (ITT). The epithelialization rates of the IL-MA and S-MA treatment were, respectively, 79.3% (66.6-88 + 8) and 71.2% (57.9-82.2) PP and 69.1% (55.2-78.5) and 64.2% (50.0-74.2) ITT. AEs in the IL-MA and S-MA groups were, respectively, clinical, 45.6% and 80.6%; laboratory, 26.5% and 73.1%; and electrocardiogram, 8.8% and 25.4%. Ten participants in the S-MA group and 1 in the IL-MA group were discontinued due to severe or persistent AEs. CONCLUSIONS: IL-MA provides a similar cure rate and results in less toxicity compared with S-MA and may be used as first-line therapy for CL patients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: REBEC: RBR-6mk5n4.

Comparison Of Efficacy Of Miltefosine Versus Meglumine Antimonate In The Treatment Of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous Leishmaniasis is a morbid condition that generates stigmatization and disfiguring scars. Pakistan is among the ninety-eight countries where cutaneous Leishmaniasis is endemic. Purpose of study was to compare the efficacy of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous Leishmaniasis. METHODS: All patients with cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups using the envelop method. Capsule Miltefosine 50 mg (2.5 mg/ kg) was given to group A, while intralesional Glucantime injection was given to group B. The treatment's efficacy was evaluated after four weeks and again after eight weeks. RESULTS: Out of 74 patients, 37 patients were included in each group. In group A (miltefosine group), 56.75% were males, and 43.25% were females. In group B (meglumine antimoniate group), 62% were males, while 38% were females (p=0.63). The mean age was 32.81 years±12.09 SD, the mean duration of the disease was 5.4 months±2.3 SD and the mean number of lesions was 2.56±1.33 SD. The efficacy of Miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate (I/L) was 91.9% and 56.75%, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Miltefosine was more effective than intralesional meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous Leishmaniasis (p<0.001).

Pilot study of safety and efficacy of topical liposomal amphotericin B for cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major in Islamic Republic of Iran.

Background: Topical nanoliposomes containing 0.4% amphotericin B (Lip-AmB 0.4%) have shown promising safety results in preclinical and phase 1 clinical trials in healthy volunteers. Aims: To evaluate safety and efficacy of Lip-AmB 0.4% in cutaneous leishmaniasis patients. Methods: Fourteen patients with a total of 84 lesions received national standard treatment of weekly intralesional meglumine antimoniate with biweekly cryotherapy, or daily intramuscular meglumine antimoniate (20 mg/kg/day for 14 days), and topical Lip-AmB 0.4% twice daily for 28 days. Twenty-two patients with a total of 46 lesions (7 at most) were treated with topical Lip-AmB 0.4% alone twice daily for 28 days. Thirty patients with a total of 68 lesions received national standard treatment of weekly intralesional meglumine antimoniate (to blanch around the lesion) and biweekly cryotherapy. Results: Sixty-six patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions completed the study. In the safety evaluation, 2 of the 36 patients evaluated reported a tolerable burning sensation and they preferred to continue treatment. Twelve (92%) of 14 patients with 84 lesions who received national standard treatment combined with Lip-AmB 0.4% completed the study with complete cure. In 1 of the patients with 4 lesions, 1 lesion showed complete cure and 3 showed partial cure. Among 22 patients with 46 lesions who received only topical LipAmB 0.4%, 19 completed the study and 18 showed complete cure (95% efficacy). In the 30 patients who received national standard treatment alone, 33 lesions in 15 patients showed complete cure (48.5%) on day 42 follow-up. Conclusion: Lip-AmB 0.4% alone or in combination with national standard treatment is safe with high-efficacy rate and warrants further investigation during phase 3 clinical trials.

Safety profile of Gadoterate meglumine on the renal function of patients with severe kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) in patients with impaired renal function has been of concern to primary care physicians due to the potential worsening of renal dysfunction and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). Our objective was to compare the potential change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with known severe renal dysfunction (eGFR <30 ml/min), following Gadoterate meglumine (GM) administration with patients who do not receive contrast. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent MRI examination at our institution, for any indication, between January 2016 and September 2020. INCLUSION CRITERIA: pre-MRI eGFR <30 ml/min within 24 h of MRI, follow-up eGFR between 48 and 96 h post-MRI, and absence of peritoneal or hemodialysis. The individuals who received GM (492 scans) were identified as cases, and those who did not receive contrast (1101 scans) were identified as controls for our study. Delta-eGFR response was calculated and covariate-adjusted, and propensity score analysis was performed. RESULTS: No significant eGFR decrease was observed in patients who received GM compared to those who did not receive GM in our study. Also, no relationship between comorbidity, severity and contrast selection was observed. CONCLUSION: The use of Gadolinium contrast in MRI is often of critical importance for determining accurate anatomic relationships, differentiation of benign from malignant lesions, or determination of resolving vs. worsening disease. Though the risk of contrast administration can never be entirely ignored, especially in patients with low eGFR, our study indicates that safe administration of GM can be performed even in patients with severe kidney disease.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents for imaging of the central nervous system: A multicenter European prospective study.

Contrast-enhanced MR (CE-MR) imaging is required to improve lesion detection and characterization and to increase diagnostic confidence. This study aims to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and usage patterns of recently introduced ClariscanTM (gadoterate meglumine) and other macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) used for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the central nervous system (CNS). Data was obtained from a European multicenter, prospective, observational postmarketing study that included pediatric and adult patients undergoing contrast-enhanced MRI with a GBCA used in routine clinical practice. Safety data was collected by spontaneous patient adverse event (AE) reporting. Effectiveness was assessed via changes in radiological diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and image quality. 766 patients with CNS-related indications were included from 8 centers across 5 European countries between December 2018 and November 2019. Clariscan (gadoterate meglumine) was used in 66% (503) of exams, Dotarem® (gadoterate meglumine) in 20% (160), Gadovist® (gadobutrol) in 13% (97), and ProHance® (gadoteridol) in 1%. GBCA use increased the diagnostic confidence in 95% (724/766) of patients and a change in radiological diagnosis in 65% (501/766) of patients. The Clariscan-specific data revealed an increase in diagnostic confidence in 94% (472/503) of patients and resulted in a change in radiological diagnosis in 58% (293/503) of patients. Image quality was considered excellent or good in 95% of patients across all GBCAs and in 94% of patients who received Clariscan. No AEs were reported in this cohort including Clariscan. This data demonstrates the excellent safety and efficacy profile of Clariscan and other GBCAs used in MRI examination of the CNS.

Efficacy of intra-lesional injections of meglumine antimoniate once a week vs. twice a week in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. tropica in Iran: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Treatment of Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is based on using antimoniate derivatives; patients' compliance for systemic injections is low due to the pain and systemic complications. In this randomized open trial, the efficacy of intra-lesional (IL) injections of meglumine antimoniate (MA) once a week vs. twice a week in the treatment of Anthrpoponothic CL caused by L. tropica was studied. Eligible volunteer patients were selected according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. The included patients were randomly allocated to receive IL-MA injections once a week or twice a week. The primary outcome was set as complete healing of the lesion(s), and defined as complete re-epithelialization and absence of induration in the lesions. A total of 180 parasitologicaly proven CL patients caused by L. tropica were recruited, 90 patients were treated with weekly IL-MA and 90 patients received IL-MA twice a week. The complete cure was 87.9% vs. 89.2% in the group received weekly and twice a week IL-MA injections, respectively (P = 0.808). Patients' compliance was acceptable and side effects were limited to a few local allergic reactions to MA. Median time to healing was significantly shorter in patients who received IL-MA twice a week (median ± SE) 37±3.8, (CI: 29.6-44.4) days compared to whom received IL-MA once a week 60±2.3, (CI: 55.6-64.5) days (P< 0.001), however the number of injections was higher in group who received IL-MA twice a week (12 vs. 9 injections). In conclusion, the rate of cure in the group of CL patients with IL-MA twice a week was not significantly different from the group who received IL-MA once a week shorten, but the duration of healing was shorter in the group who received IL-MA twice a week while the group received more injections so is recommended to use IL-MA once a week due to the fact the compliance is acceptable with limited side effects. Clinical Trial Registration: IRCT20081130001475N13; https://en.irct.ir/.

Use of Real-Life Safety Data From International Pharmacovigilance Databases to Assess the Importance of Symptoms Associated With Gadolinium Exposure.

OBJECTIVE: Recent scientific publications have reported cases of patients who complained from a variety of symptoms after they received a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA). The aim of this study was to appreciate the importance of these clinical manifestations in the overall population by assessing the weight of "symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure" (SAGE) among the bulk of safety experiences reported to major health authorities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure were identified from a review of the scientific literature, and the corresponding preferred terms were searched in each system organ class (SOC) category recorded in the European and North American pharmacovigilance databases EudraVigilance (EV) and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), respectively. The numbers of SAGE per preferred term, and cumulatively per SOC, were recorded and their weights in the overall spectrum of adverse events (AEs) were determined for each GBCA. RESULTS: The analysis of the selected AEs revealed a significantly higher SAGE weight for gadobenate dimeglumine (EV: 25.83%, FAERS: 32.24%) than for gadoteridol (EV: 15.51%; FAERS: 21.13%) and significantly lower SAGE weights for gadobutrol (EV: 7.75%; FAERS: 13.31%) and gadoterate meglumine (EV: 8.66%; FAERS: 12.99%). A similar ranking was found for most of the SOCs except for "nervous system disorders," probably owing to a limitation in the methods of data selection. Furthermore, this analysis showed a greater percentage of reports mentioning a decrease in the quality of life of the patients when they were exposed to gadobenate dimeglumine or gadoteridol than to gadobutrol or gadoterate meglumine. CONCLUSION: This study showed that SAGE represent a significant percentage of the bulk of AEs reported to the health authorities for each GBCA. It provided real-life arguments suggesting that SAGE may be more prevalent with linear than macrocyclic GBCAs and that gadoteridol may present a higher SAGE risk than the other macrocyclic contrast agents.

A case of gadobenate dimeglumine-induced anaphylactic shock: a case report.

A 70-year-old man was admitted to our hospital due to "liver cirrhosis; grade 3 hypertension; pulmonary infection". On May 27, 2019, during upper abdomen plain and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), the patient experienced anaphylactic shock, manifested as sudden unconsciousness and lack of response, after intravenous administration of gadobenate dimeglumine (Multihance®). Gadobenate dimeglumine is a paramagnetic contrast used during diagnostic MRI. It has hepatobiliary specificity with very good imaging performance. A small amount is absorbed by normal liver cells after intravenous injection and excreted via the bile ducts while maintaining the chemical structure of gadobenate dimeglumine. It allows the visualization of local angiogenesis and perfusion, which reflect the hepatic blood supply and recent liver function, thereby providing a reference for clinical diagnosis. Gadobenate dimeglumine intravenous injection may cause adverse reactions such as nausea, dizziness, and anaphylactic shock. Anaphylactic shock is a known serious adverse reaction of gadobenate dimeglumine injection. In this paper, we report a case of gadobenate dimeglumine-induced anaphylactic shock based on the temporal relationship between the onset of symptoms and the injection. The patient received chest compressions and balloon-assisted ventilation in addition to rehydration and volume expansion and vasoactive drugs to maintain blood pressure, etc. The patient died despite treatments. In the clinical, physicians, nurses, and clinical pharmacists should closely monitor patients and promptly discontinue drug administration and provide symptomatic care in case of adverse reactions.

Patterns of use, effectiveness and safety of gadolinium contrast agents: a European prospective cross-sectional multicentre observational study.

BACKGROUND: The EU gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) market has changed in recent years due to the European Medicines Agency decision to suspend the marketing authorisation of linear GBCA and the marketing authorisation of new generic macrocyclic GBCA. The study aims to understand the patterns of (GBCA) use, and to study the effectiveness and safety of GBCA in routine practice across Europe. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional, multicentre, observational study in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Reported usage patterns included indication, referral and examination details. Assessment of effectiveness included changes in radiological diagnosis, diagnostic confidence and image quality. Safety data were collected by spontaneous patient adverse event (AE) reporting. RESULTS: 2118 patients were included from 8 centres across 5 European countries between December 2018 and November 2019. Clariscan, Dotarem (gadoteric acid), Gadovist (gadobutrol) and ProHance (gadoteridol) were utilised in 1513 (71.4%), 356 (16.8%), 237 (11.2%) and 12 (0.6%) patients, respectively. Most were performed in CNS-related indications (46.2%). Mean GBCA doses were 0.10 mmol/kg body weight, except for Gadovist (mean 0.12 mmol/kg). GBCA use increased confidence in diagnosis in 96.2% of examinations and resulted in a change in radiological diagnosis in 73.9% of patients. Image quality was considered excellent or good in 96.1% of patients and across all GBCA. Four patients reported AEs (0.19%), with only 1 (0.05%) considered serious. CONCLUSIONS: This European study confirmed that GBCAs are used appropriately in Europe for a wide range of indications. The study demonstrated a significant increase in diagnostic confidence after GBCA use and confirmed the good safety profile of GBCAs, with comparable results for all agents used.

[The results of phase III multicenter open randomized controlled study REM-Chol-III-16 in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis syndrome caused by chronic diffuse liver diseases].

AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of Remaxol, solution for infusion, compared with parenteral form of S-adenosyl-L-methionine, in the treatment of patients with intrahepatic cholestasis syndrome accompanying chronic diffuse liver diseases of various etiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a multicenter open-label comparative study of the safety and efficacy of Remaxol (inosine + meglumine + methionine + nicotinamide + succinic acid) 317 patients aged 18 to 65 years were randomized into 2 groups: patients of the experimental group (n=168) received intravenous Remaxol, solution for infusion, 400 ml, and patients of the control group (n=149) Heptral (S-adenosyl-L-methionine) 800 mg. The duration of treatment was 10 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who responded to therapy, as demonstrated by dynamics of laboratory parameters of liver functional status: decrease in gamma glutamyl transpeptidase level by 40%, and/or alkaline phosphatase level by 30%, and/or decrease total bilirubin level by 30% from baseline by the end of the treatment course. RESULTS: The proportion of responders was 51% in the Remaxol group vs. 44.9% in the Heptral group (p=0.303); the lower limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of responders was -4.01%, which exceeds the non-inferiority margin pre-defined by the study protocol, thus, the non-inferiority hypothesis was proven, i.e. Remaxol at a dose of 400 ml/day demonstrates similar efficacy to Heptral at a dose of 800 mg/day in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis syndrome associated with chronic diffuse liver diseases. Similar positive trends in the levels of transaminases, total bilirubin and the severity of pruritus were revealed in both treatment groups. We did not reveal statistically significant between-group differences in the frequency of adverse events definitely related to the study treatment. CONCLUSION: Administration of Remaxol as a part of the pathogenetic therapy of patients with intrahepatic cholestasis syndrome who need hepatoprotection is justified.

Safety of gadoterate meglumine in children younger than 2 years of age.

BACKGROUND: Few studies on the safety of gadolinium-based contrast agents have been performed in children with even fewer focusing on children younger than 2 years of age. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem) in patients younger than 2 years of age by evaluating adverse events following contrast administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pediatric patients younger than 2 years of age undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without contrast were prospectively enrolled and received a weight-based intravenous dose of gadoterate meglumine (0.1 mmol/kg). The occurrence of adverse events was assessed at the time of injection, 2 h after MRI, and by phone contact using a standard questionnaire 24 h after MRI. Adverse events were documented including the time of onset, duration of symptoms, intensity, causality and subsequent outcome. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize patient information. RESULTS: One hundred fifty exams were completed in 150 patients (median age: 12.1 months, age range: 0.25-23 months; males: 56%). Almost all patients (97.3%) received sedation/anesthesia before and during MRI. Thirty-four adverse events were reported in 23 patients overall (15.3%; male: 73.9%; median age: 11 months, age range: 3-23 months). Within the initial 2 h after the injection, there was one report of transient flushing/warmth and one report of vomiting, the latter of which was related to drinking formula too soon after anesthesia. Twenty-two patients (14.7%), who had all received sedation/anesthesia, experienced minor adverse events within 24 h, most physiological. Fourteen patients (9.3%) reported emesis, eight (5.3%) reported transient flushing/warmth, seven (4.7%) reported nausea, one (0.7%) reported altered taste and one (0.7%) reported dizziness. No patient experienced anaphylaxis. Two patients (1.3%) reported allergic-like reactions, which consisted of wheezing or sneezing. CONCLUSION: No patient experienced adverse events directly related to gadoterate meglumine. Only two adverse events were reported to have occurred in the initial 2 h after the exam, while the rest were reported on the 24-h follow-up call. The higher reported rate of adverse events in this study may be related to concomitant sedation/anesthesia as well as to overreporting from parents on the 24-h follow-up questionnaire. The study confirms a good safety profile for gadoterate meglumine in this very sensitive population.

Observational study on the incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal impairment following gadoterate meglumine administration: the NSsaFe study.

BACKGROUND: Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is a rare life-threatening condition strongly associated with the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents in patients with severe or endstage renal impairment. PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the incidence of NSF in patients with renal impairment after administration of gadoterate meglumine. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: In all, 540 patients with moderate, severe, or endstage renal impairment, scheduled to undergo a routine contrast-enhanced MRI with gadoterate meglumine. Mean age was 69.7 ± 12.7 years (range: 21-95) with 58.4% of males. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T or 3.0T, sequence according to each site practice. ASSESSMENT: Medical history, indication(s) for current MRI and adverse events were recorded for each patient. Patients were followed up over 2 years after administration with three visits separated by at least 3 months to detect any signs/symptoms suggestive of NSF. STATISTICAL TESTS: Descriptive. RESULTS: Renal impairment was graded as moderate for 69.4% of patients, severe for 16.0% and endstage for 12.1%; 2.6% had undergone a kidney transplant. Estimated glomerular filtration rate ranged from 4 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 except one value of 74 mL/min/1.73 m2 in a patient with kidney transplant. Central nervous system exploration was the main MRI indication (34.7%) and mean dose injected was 0.22 ± 0.09 mL/kg. Overall, 446 patients (82.6%) attended at least one follow-up visit and completed the NSF questionnaire and 329 (60.9%) attended the 2-year visit. No suspicion of NSF was reported in all 446 patients, including 119 patients with severe or endstage renal impairment. No deaths and no adverse events were reported during the MRI examination and the usual period of follow-up after gadoterate meglumine administration. DATA CONCLUSION: No cases of NSF were observed in the 446 patients with moderate to endstage renal impairment followed up over a maximum of 2 years after injection of gadoterate meglumine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:607-614.

Does Gadoterate Meglumine Cause Gadolinium Retention in the Brain of Children? A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Accumulation of macrocyclic gadolinium agents in children's brains remain to be determined. PURPOSE: To demonstrate whether there is an intracranial macrocyclic gadolinium deposition after multiple contrast-enhanced MRI with gadoterate meglumine in a pediatric population. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective case-control. POPULATION: In all, 45 children (age range: 5-17 years; mean, 13.7 ± 3.4 years) for the study group and 45 healthy children (age range: 5-17 years; mean, 13.7 ± 3.4 years) for the control group. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T1 - and T2 -weighted axial images on a 1.5T scanner. ASSESSMENT: Children with at least three enhanced brain MRIs and an age- and sex-matched control group with an unenhanced brain MRIs were compared in terms of T1 signal intensity (SI). All patients in the study group received gadoterate meglumine intravenously (0.1 mmol/kg). SI measurements were made by drawing six regions of interest (ROIs): dentate nuclei (DN), pons, globus pallidi (GP), frontal white matter (FWM), thalamus (T), clivus, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for both groups on unenhanced T1 -weighted images. STATISTICAL TESTS: Student's t-test was used for comparison of SI. The Pearson correlation was calculated for the correlation between the SI and the number of gadolinium administrations. RESULTS: A significant difference was detected between two groups for DN/CSF, pons/CSF, GP/CSF, thalamus/CSF, and FWM/CSF (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.002, P = 0.024, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two groups for clivus/CSF (P = 0.15). A good correlation between the number of gadoterate meglumine administrations and the SI for DN/CSF, pons/CSF, GP/CSF, and T/CSF (r = 0.80, r = 0.73, r = 0.91, and r = 0.90, respectively) was found. DATA CONCLUSION: A significant T1 SI increase reflecting gadolinium retention in the brain was detected for children with at least three gadoterate meglumine administrations in this series. The number of administrations correlated well with the increased SI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1471-1477.

Risk of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis in Patients With Stage 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving a Group II Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: Risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) to individual patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD; defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) who receive a group II gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) is not well understood or summarized in the literature. Objective: To assess the pooled risk of NSF in patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD receiving a group II GBCA. Data Sources: A health sciences informationist searched the Ovid (MEDLINE and MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citation, and Daily and Versions), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Open Grey databases from inception to January 29, 2019, yielding 2700 citations. Study Selection: Citations were screened for inclusion in a multistep process. Agreement for final cohort inclusion was determined by 2 blinded screeners using Cohen κ. Inclusion criteria consisted of stage 4 or 5 CKD with or without dialysis, administration of an unconfounded American College of Radiology classification group II GBCA (gadobenate dimeglumine, gadobutrol, gadoterate meglumine, or gadoteridol), and incident NSF as an outcome. Conference abstracts, retracted manuscripts, narrative reviews, editorials, case reports, and manuscripts not reporting total group II GBCA administrations were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction was performed for all studies by a single investigator, including publication details, study design and time frame, patient characteristics, group II GBCA(s) administered, total exposures for patients with stage 4 or stage 5 CKD, total cases of unconfounded NSF, reason for GBCA administration, follow-up duration, loss to follow-up, basis for NSF screening, and diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pooled incidence of NSF and the associated upper bound of a 2-sided 95% CI (risk estimate) for the pooled data and each of the 4 group II GBCAs. Results: Sixteen unique studies with 4931 patients were included (κ = 0.68) in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of NSF was 0 of 4931 (0%; upper bound of 95% CI, 0.07%). The upper bound varied owing to different sample sizes for gadobenate dimeglumine (0 of 3167; upper bound of 95% CI, 0.12%), gadoterate meglumine (0 of 1204; upper bound of 95% CI, 0.31%), gadobutrol (0 of 330; upper bound of 95% CI, 1.11%), and gadoteridol (0 of 230; upper bound of 95% CI, 1.59%). Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings suggest that the risk of NSF from group II GBCA administration in stage 4 or 5 CKD is likely less than 0.07%. The potential diagnostic harms of withholding group II GBCA for indicated examinations may outweigh the risk of NSF in this population. Trial Registration: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42019123284.